Het marktaandeel van Windows ten opzichte van Apple daalt met rasse schreden. De verhouding verkochte apparaten met Windows vs. OS X en iOS is nog maar 2:1, waar dat in 2004 nog bijna 60:1 was.
Dieptepunt: 56:1
Onderzoek van Horace Dediu wijst uit dat het marktaandeel van Windows historisch laag is. In Apple's eerste jaar, 1984, werden er per verkochte Mac 6 Windows-pc’s verkocht. Dit steeg vervolgens gestaag, kende in 1990 weer een dieptepunt (voor Windows dan) met 7 Windows-pc's per verkochte Mac, maar groeide tot 2004 tot angstaanjagende hoogte. In dat jaar werden er per apparaat dat OS X draaide maar liefst 56 Windows-pc’s verkocht.
OS X en iOS?
Na 2004 kwam Microsoft echter in een vrije val terecht. Deze val werd in 2007 nog veel drastischer, door de komst van iOS. Als je alleen kijkt naar de verhouding Windows - Mac, dan is de verhouding nu nog steeds 19:1, maar omdat iOS ook telt als volwaardig besturingssysteem (een tablet is voor velen immers een goede computervervanger) heeft onderzoeker Dediu dit ook meegenomen (voor de goede orde: smartphones met Windows 7 zijn ook meegenomen en de Surface zal volgend jaar ook meedoen).
Als de groei van Apple, en met name de iPad, zo doorzet, dan is het moment dat Apple aan de goede kant van de balans staat in zicht. Of zal de Surface een nieuwe kentering teweegbrengen?
(Personal Computers) People need to be aware that the reviews you see for the iPad often refcelt the old Mac/PC platform wars with some people making comments who simply don't like iPads from a distance, without actually owning one, because they see it as part of the deplorable Apple mania they find so distasteful. They're entitled to their opinion, of course, but it is unfortunate they skew the evaluation of this product without the deep acquaintance one needs in order to give it an insightful evaluation.I have taught computer science at the college level for 26 years and have had computers with all kinds of operating systems. I don't own Apple stock and have never known anyone who works at Apple. I therefore have no connection to Apple. I have had my iPad for about a month and read a fair number of reviews before I purchased, spent some time using one at the store, and thought about what I might use one for, in contrast to my laptop with which I am well satisfied. People too often think of computers in terms of hardware, the specs and looks, instead of the software and the functionality. You should ask yourself, What will I use this for that solves a problem I would like to have solved? Software is always more important than hardware, even though it is the hardware that makes an impression.The iPad is not a laptop and is not principally a production computer, that is, a computer on which you are going to develop web pages, do serious graphics editing, or write a book. You could use your new Taurus to tow a trailer, but that is not what it is designed to do well. These things can increasingly be done on an iPad, but I don't believe they will ever be what it is best at. It is a portable media machine with an inviting touch interface that requires a somewhat different set of skills, which take a modest amount of time to learn. Surfing the web, checking email, watching movies, playing games, looking at new cars, reading the Economist magazine, all work better on an iPad than a laptop. It does these things very well indeed. There are now 80,000 apps for a wide variety of activities given its design intent. The apps are either free or reasonably priced, so you can get a bunch from the app store for little investment. As with Amazon, you can see what other people think of an app before getting one.This would be a splendid acquisition for small children, for teens deep into social networking, for an adult wanting to drop into the love seat for a quick look at what is happening in the world, for a senior citizen who wants a simple, inviting system with few hassles, to stay in touch with grandchildren. The iPad is not a light laptop; it is instead a different way to use computing to do a wide variety of consumption and communication not principally production.In my experience, its wi-fi is adroit from one environment to another. It knows where it is geographically, scans its environment for wi-fi, and accesses wi-fi seamlessly. At this point in time, we should expect no less. I cannot address the 3G communications since I have a wi-fi only (I am not convinced of the value of the 3G and I can use my phone as a hotspot). I have never had it crash, though I have had to back myself out of apps that seemed to have no logical next step. This was the result either of my ignorance or the fact that there is less of a standard user interface from app to app than there is in classical GUIs such as OS X and Windows.For the laptop lugging road-warrior, it should be noted, this is not going to be a full replacement. I now take my laptop and my iPad when I go into the college. But much of the time there, I use my iPad because it is so light, convenient and useable. I use it to teach my classes and often reference traditional texts from the iPad instead of lugging them along to class. I develop my own web pages on my 27 desktop which is the right environment for such development; I wouldn't expect to do that on an iPad. In education (and evidently in medicine), it is proving to be a real boon. The enterprise situations where portable information access and transmission are critical will find this a compelling solution. The heavy Photoshop user or music track editor will still need a conventional computer, either laptop or desktop.I purchased the 64GB version, which may be more storage than I need. But since it will drive my 50 screen downstairs I figured I would begin to load lots of pictures and favored music, so it may prove a wise choice in the long run. It can swallow up entire evenings with the music-augmented slide shows it can do. In fact, you may begin to wonder if you need cable TV. Conventional content providers should be worried about the iPad since it provides yet another way for the user to determine viewing experience. But if you are still drawn to cable, it makes a fine remote control.Before people evaluate